Not logged in
Posts referring to the Mitsubishi HC5000BL
Click the topic name to jump to the matching post
Jump to page: <<<12345>>> (5 total)
|
| Mar 11, 2010 2:52:17 PM
I purchased a used Mitsu HC 5000 not long ago and in mounting it and hooking it up I noticed that on dark screen there are several green globe looking items speckeled on the screen. I assume this is dust internally in the light path but is there a way to clean it? |
| | | |
| Apr 20, 2008 9:19:58 PM
3 years ago I bought and ceiling-mounted Optoma EZ738 800x600 projector 15 feet from a DIY blackout lining 117" 16:9 screen with black frame and curtains. The room is fairly good - fully light-controlled and has white ceiling and brown walls. I was very happy with the setup but finally I decided to upgrade for the 1080p projector - namely Mitsubishi HC5000 which can be found for around $2000+ now and has blazing reviews. However I'm stuck with a weird observation: [B]my old Optoma has a broghtness rating of 1800 ANSI lumens[/B] (and reviews say around 705 lumens measured in video-calibrated mode), and the [B]Mitsubishi only has 1000 ANSI lumens rating[/B], and even less measured. However Mitsubishi contrast is claimed 10,000:1 and Optoma - 2000:1. I'm confused...
[B]Will Mitsubishi be perceivably dimmer than Optoma when screening films???[/B] Optoma is barely bright enough, although with 800x600 native resolution and 16:9 screen some light is probably getting lost. But I always wanted a somewhat brighter picture, so getting a darker one might be a big problem for me! I suspect I'm missing something, as the 1000 ANSI lumen brightness rating is fairly common and even good among affordable 1080p projectors. Also, contrast rating is so drastically different it must mean something.
Can someone please clarify it for me? I can't check it locally, and I don't want to spend $2000 and get a darker picture, I'd have to have similar or preferably brighter... But reviews say Mitsubishi is bright enough for a larger-than-normal screen, so I'm lost...
Thanks! |
| | | |
| Jan 4, 2008 6:07:34 PM
Got a wierd one here. I have had the HC5000 since mid year and watch standard DVDs on it every second night. I have 2 dvd players in the home: my original Pioneer DV-360 (UK model) and newer Panasonic DVD/VCR combo unit. After much testing and swapping, I had to resort to the trusty Pioneer connected via S-Video as opposed to the Panasonic on Component.
I am really baffled. I have an eye for detail so can tell the differences - what baffles me and I am looking for input from others - the colours (or perhaps contrast) from the Pioneer S-Video connection is better in view than the component from Panasonic. The Panasonic's component picture where blacks are concerned is quite washed out. (All this without adjusting the settings on the HC5000.)
True the detail on Component is noticeable and in A-B comparison more detailed (likely just better definition around edges which sums up as a better overall picture detail wise - this is Component's domain anyway). However colour/contrast wise it doesn't seem to match the S-Video ...
FInally the Component picture has interference (?) pattern of diagonal lines slowly creeping across the picture. Enough I reckon to affect the overall picture. This is absent from the S-Video picture and I think this is what is affecting the component picture - at least the first thing to eliminate. I have tried all settings on the HC5000 but none eliminate nor improve the lines - its like a mismatch of synch or something. Even if I can increase blackness for Component picture, this lines thing still prevails and dilutes the overall picture quality. I expected Component to be S-Video and a bang lot more.
Has anyone experienced this before? |
| | | |
| Nov 13, 2007 8:30:50 AM
My partner and I have hung about 4 of these projectors. The last 2, in the past month have had a very bad keystone affect right out of the box. We have the projectors hooked up with a HDMI cable and it seems there is no way to correct the keystone. If anyone can offer some help I would greatly appreciate it.
I do not remember this problem with the 1st 2 projectors. They had perfect images, not a trapazoid shape. |
| | | |
| Oct 24, 2007 12:23:02 PM
First off, this site and the forums are AWESOME!!! Thanks to all for the continued input and information.
I am researching projectors for a theater room in my basement. In doing so, I came across the Mitz HC5000. On the Mitz web-site, there is a calculator available for download which enables you to enter in all your room characteristics ... ceiling height, screen size, etc. in order to obtain what Mitz recommends for mounting distances. With the HC5000, it shows that at a throw distance of 13' for projection on a 119" screen with a 16:9 format, ceiling mount (ceiling height of 7'10" or 94"), the mounting arm needs to be anywhere from 27" to 62" in length. At that length, the projector will hang right in the middle of the room. Ideally, I would only want a maximum of a 6" mount arm.
Is this correct or has anyone had any experience with this projector mounted much closer to the ceiling?
Thanks. |
| | |
Jump to page: <<<12345>>> (5 total)
|
All times are UTC-8.0. Local time is Sep 2, 2010 11:11:38 PM
Copyright © 2005 – 2010 Big Screen Forums. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
|
|